Description
Okay...c'mon!! Now people can build structures even??? Are you kidding me?
No they can't. This is absolute insanity. The 9th circuit ruling does not allow this, and not only that, it doesn't allow people to even be in River Park at all for that matter, nor just anywhere they choose.
Recent comments in the latest hearing included:
The ruling, they wrote, “holds only that governments cannot criminalize the act of sleeping with the use of rudimentary protections, such as bedding, from the elements in some public places when a person has nowhere else to sleep.”
The ruling “does not establish an unrestrained right for involuntarily homeless persons to sleep anywhere they choose,” Silver and Gould wrote. “Nor does it require jurisdictions to cede all public spaces to involuntarily homeless persons.”
So to reiterate: IT DOES NOT REQUIRE JURISDICTIONS TO CEDE ALL PUBLIC SPACES TO INVOLUNTARY HOMELESS PERSONS.
Which means, that yes, they will be forced to relocate somewhere else that they'll have to figure out. How about to city hall?! But if you let people destroy the last of our water ways, Marina and the only gems we have left here, then most people will give up and leave. Say goodbye to any hope we have left to turn this place around. The amount of homeless here is manageable So prioritize this ASAP as an emergency. This is absolutely insane that this is allowed to go on... in this location especially. Wooden structures, cars being worked on all the while dry grass is getting taller, dryer and safety hazards, bio hazards grow. Residents are getting threatened and feel safe anymore.
People are becoming less empathetic and less tolerant and this isn't going to turn out well if the city doesn't move people out of that location asap.
I encourage anyone who feels the same way to make some noise, keep on it! write call and don't stop!
also asked...
A. Alley/Street/Public Property (city/county/state/fed owned)
14 Comments
City of Vallejo (Verified Official)
ClickFixer (Registered User)
Greater Vallejo Recreation District is funded directly by Vallejo residents’ property taxes. Citizens can reasonably expect that the camping restriction ordinance (030 VMC) is rationally related to legitimate local interests and should not preempted by California state or Federal law. Residents of the city of Vallejo should reject any argument that the local ordinance has been preempted by California state or Federal law to regulate the property rights of persons experiencing homelessness, the purpose of the ordinance is to regulate camping; it does not purport to regulate the rights of property ownership.
In California, eminent domain gives the government the power to take your property, even if you don’t want to move. But under the Fifth Amendment, eminent domain must be for a “public use,” which traditionally meant projects like roads or bridges. Cleaning up a park is under “public use”. The US Supreme Court ruled (4-5 in 2005) to expand the definition of “Public Use”.
7.67.030 VMC: “Unlawful camping. It shall be unlawful for any person to camp, occupy camp facilities and use camp paraphernalia, or cause a disturbance or nuisance in the following areas: any park, any street or public property.
Solano County needs to enforce the law here.
DR (Registered User)
ClickFixer (Registered User)
This structure is in violation of county code and ordinance. This park “River Park” 485 Wilson Avenue is County jurisdiction, but the City of Vallejo has repeatedly assigned this type of request to Code Enforcement Division (CDE). These requests are routinely ignored or closed by CDE.
In the spirit of cooperation and community outreach this the Interim Manager of CDE should reassign this request to Natalie Petersen City of Vallejo, Homeless Manager to coordinate with Solano County law enforcement.
CIVIL CODE - CIV
DIVISION 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS [3274 - 9566] ( Heading of Division 4 amended by Stats. 1988, Ch. 160, Sec. 16. )
PART 3. NUISANCE [3479 - 3508.2] ( Part 3 enacted 1872. )
TITLE 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES [3479 - 3486.5] ( Title 1 enacted 1872. )
3479.
Anything which is injurious to health, including, but not limited to, the illegal sale of controlled substances, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, or unlawfully obstructs the free passage or use, in the customary manner, of any navigable lake, or river, bay, stream, canal, or basin, or any public park, square, street, or highway, is a nuisance.
(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 658, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1997.)
ClickFixer (Registered User)
DR (Registered User)
Vallejo Heights Resident (Registered User)
ClickFixer (Registered User)
After the fire devastation we have seen in other waterfront communities (ie. HI) something in the way of fire prevention or protection is in order.
ConcernedCitizen (Registered User)
FixVallejo (Registered User)
DR (Registered User)
510 cubic yards of garbage were removed from the area, the release indicates, as well as 45 50-gallon bins of human biological contaminants.CHP-Solano, Caltrans, UC Davis Police, Union Pacific Railroad, Solano County Health and Social Services and Solano County Behavioral Health were all involved in the cleanup.“We want to thank our partner agencies for their support and our community for their patience,” the department said. hmmmm The city of Davis gets their 12 person encampment cleared by Solano County, but Vallejo does not get the same treatment.
GiantsFanForever (Registered User)
Get this city cleaned up period or face a mass citizens law suit.
GiantsFanForever (Registered User)
svalenti (Verified Official)